<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbohydrates &amp; Glycemic Index &#8211; Made Simple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blazeonline.com/wls/carbohydrates-glycemic-index-made-simple-1618/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blazeonline.com/wls/carbohydrates-glycemic-index-made-simple-1618/</link>
	<description>Helping People Lose Weight Via Traditional &#38; Surgery Alternatives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:53:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Merk</title>
		<link>http://www.blazeonline.com/wls/carbohydrates-glycemic-index-made-simple-1618/comment-page-1/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Merk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blazeonline.com/wls/?p=1618#comment-912</guid>
		<description>Just click on the link &quot;Glycemic index&quot; in the 2nd paragraph and it will take you to a list of the most common foods via Wikipedia. 

One of the very best lists can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.montignac.com/en/ig_tableau.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here:&lt;/a&gt; I like this list, becasue it&#039;s scientific and the author actually set the low glycemic or good glycemic level at 45 (55 was a compromise with food manufactures and traditionalists when the glycemic index 1st came out (many food items nutritionists recommend were in the medium category. In addition the 1st glycemic index used white bread as the 100 mark rather than pure glucose. The GI of white bread can change depending on where it&#039;s sourced. A much better standard for the GI index is glucose. It&#039;s GI is always the same.

Most food manufacturers do not include GI info on their nutrient lists yet, so lists like Wikipedia are as good as it gets for the time being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just click on the link &#8220;Glycemic index&#8221; in the 2nd paragraph and it will take you to a list of the most common foods via Wikipedia. </p>
<p>One of the very best lists can be found <a href="http://www.montignac.com/en/ig_tableau.php" rel="nofollow">here:</a> I like this list, becasue it&#8217;s scientific and the author actually set the low glycemic or good glycemic level at 45 (55 was a compromise with food manufactures and traditionalists when the glycemic index 1st came out (many food items nutritionists recommend were in the medium category. In addition the 1st glycemic index used white bread as the 100 mark rather than pure glucose. The GI of white bread can change depending on where it&#8217;s sourced. A much better standard for the GI index is glucose. It&#8217;s GI is always the same.</p>
<p>Most food manufacturers do not include GI info on their nutrient lists yet, so lists like Wikipedia are as good as it gets for the time being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodi H</title>
		<link>http://www.blazeonline.com/wls/carbohydrates-glycemic-index-made-simple-1618/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodi H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blazeonline.com/wls/?p=1618#comment-911</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this article...I found it very informative.  My question would be: how do you find out what the GI number is on foods?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this article&#8230;I found it very informative.  My question would be: how do you find out what the GI number is on foods?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.blazeonline.com/wls/carbohydrates-glycemic-index-made-simple-1618/feed/ ) in 0.68147 seconds, on Feb 8th, 2012 at 1:18 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 1:18 pm UTC -->
